IF HARPER HAD A MAJORITY WE WOULD HAVE AN ECOMOMIC MESS BY NOW

Stephan Harper is a man bitterly determined to destroy the Liberal party, as even his close friends admit.  This has created a parliament in which the nation is essentially used as an audience while the political parties joust for attention. Meanwhile  the nation’s real issues are ignored—who has time for that while in a battle for public attention?.
We will not get a working parliament back till Stephen is gone–politics is all he is interested in, not what are to him the mundane  problems of the nation. He expressed his concern for us in this  address to the Council for national Policy aid:
“Canada is a Northern European welfare state in the worst sense of the term, and very proud of it. Canadians make no connection between the fact that they are a Northern European welfare state and the fact that we have very low economic growth, a standard of living substantially lower than yours, a massive brain drain of young professionals to your country, and double the unemployment rate of the United States.”

It should be obvious, then, that he intends to privatize public organizations  wherever he can and it seems likely that he would have deregulated our banks long ago if he had the majority he so fervently seeks. They would then have crashed alongside of their American brothers.

And that is why I have to question the intelligence of those who still support this man‘s economic policy. He keeps on saying he is doing a great job of the economy and many voters actually believe the guy.
Even after the economic collapse brought about by those  policy’s that Harper supports, he ignored the horrendous loss of jobs, assuring us they would be replaced with more competitive jobs. Imagine the economic mess we would now be in if the opposition parties had not forced him the put in the stimulus  program that he now takes full credit  for. Think how disastrous it would have been if he had a majority. Economic stability? All the education in economics in the world is no match when confronted by  an ideology

And putting aside Harper’s contempt for parliament, for a moment, how about his word? He recently again stated that he would not table a bill to stop abortions. But this man had also said he would put an end to political appointments to the Senate. And how many other promises has he made in the past that he no longer endorses.

I suggest that to Stephen Harper–with his blind determination to destroy the liberal party and all it stands for–he will say whatever is needed that will further his aim without even being aware that what he says might be judged in any other context than that.

What concern’s me most is why our population can be so easily mesmerized by statements about the economy just because they are repeated over and over again. Could this suggest a breakdown in our education  system? Or are our brains being filled by toxics of some sort? Remember that Rome fell when lead poisoning afflicted the city.

Cheers
Andy Mulcahy

About Monist

Hi, my name is Andy Mulcahy . I consider myself a monist and I am retired from steam engineering lo,these many years ago, and the Portland Cement industry. I have evolved into a Humanist-am a member of the Victoria Secular Humanist Association and The Humanist Association of Canada.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s